2/14/2024 0 Comments Backblaze b2 vs s3Both Wasabi and Backblaze offer “hot” access storage at a cost approaching cold storage offerings from AWS and Azure. They offer simpler pricing models for their storage offerings but lack the ability to provide a broader set of workflows e.g. These include Wasabi and Backblaze cloud providers that specialize in providing cloud-based object storage. Wasabi or Backblaze for Business – Cost Comparison Note that this access cost is different from the egress costs. This column what the costs would be (Storage Only) if no access was performed. ** Storage + Access v/s Storage Only: Larger cloud providers tend to charge an “access cost” for colder storage tiers. NOTE: Click on each provider for a detailed breakdown of costs. In the following table, we compare storing 100 TB of content in each cloud provider with a 10% retrieval every month. ĭNAfabric supports Amazon AWS S3, Microsoft Azure Blob, Google Cloud as a target for project backup and archive (Avid Media Composer, Adobe Premiere, AAF) and workspace backup and archive. Consider re-purposing in the cloud as the egress charges are minimal for retrieving within the same AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud datacenter. However, egress costs can be curbed if content is re-purposed in the cloud.Įgress costs for AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud can often be a majority of the price you pay for cloud storage.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |